Er is N2; (b) the preset harm hanger is N3; (c) final results for harm hanger (a)N4; (d) the preset hanger is is N2; may be the preset Pinacidil MedChemExpress BI-0115 custom synthesis Figure 5. five. Identification final results for DC1 C12: would be the preset damage hanger N2; (b) N5. preset Figure Identification the preset DC1 C12: (a) the preset harm harm hanger (b) the damage hanger is N3; (c)(c) the preset damage hanger is N4; (d) the preset harm hanger is N5. damage hanger is N3; the preset harm hanger is N4; (d) the preset harm hanger is N5.0.22 0.20 0.22 0.18 0.20 0.16 0.18 0.14 0.16 0.12 0.14 0.ten 0.12 0.08 0.ten 0.06 0.08 0.04 0.06 0.02 0.04 0.00 0.02 N1 0.00 N0.(c) (c)(d) (d)Reduction ratio of cable force Reduction ratio of cable forceReduction ratio of cable force Reduction ratio of cable force10 20 30 ten 20 30N2 NNNNNN7 NN8 NN9 N0.20 0.22 0.18 0.20 0.16 0.18 0.14 0.16 0.12 0.14 0.ten 0.12 0.08 0.ten 0.06 0.08 0.04 0.06 0.02 0.04 0.00 0.02 N1 0.00 N10 20 30 10 20 30N2 NN3 NNNNN7 NN8 NN9 NHanger N5 N6 N3 N4 number Hanger numberHanger quantity N4 N5 N6 Hanger numberFigure 6. Identification outcomes for DC13 C18. Identification benefits for DC1 C12: (a) the preset Figure 6. Identification benefits for DC13 C18. Identification outcomes for DC1 C12: (a) the preset harm hangers are are N2 and for DC13 C18. Identification benefits for DC1 C12: (a) the preset Figure six. Identificationand N4;N4; the the preset harm hangers are N3and N7. harm hangers N2 benefits (b) (b) preset harm hangers are N3and N7. damage hangers are N2 and N4; (b) the preset harm hangers are N3and N7.(a) (a)(b) (b)From Figure 5, it cancan seen that when a single hanger is damaged, thethe recognition From Figure 5, it be be observed that when a single hanger is broken, recognition resultperfect. As cancan be seen that when a single hanger isratio of of cable force of result From excellent.five, it could seen from the the figure, the reduction ratio cable force of thethe is is Figure As be be observed from figure, the reduction damaged, the recognition damaged hanger might be noticed from degree of of reduction ratio of cable force of your outcome is hanger As is proportional for the degree harm. The reduction of of cable force broken great. is proportional to thethe figure, thedamage. The reduction cable force only happens inside the proportional to the degree the broken hanger of Figure 5a might be broken hanger is broken hanger. Hence,of harm. The reduction of cable force rapidly and quickly situated, which is N2, N3, S4N4, and N5, respectively. The ratio of cable force reduction and quantitative identification results are shown in Table two. From Table 2, it can be observed that when a single hanger is damaged, the identification result of your cable force reduction ratio is absolutely constant using the actual reduction ratio. Having said that, the reduction ratio of cable force is much less than the degree of harm, so this process can only comparatively quantify the degree of harm.Appl. Sci. 2021, 11,eight ofTable two. Actual cable force reduction ratio and identification results (one particular hanger broken alone). Hanger No. N2 N3 N4 N5 Harm Degree 20 0.1273/0.1273 0.1300/0.1300 0.1325/0.1325 0.1332/0.10 0.0609/0.0609 0.0623/0.0623 0.0635/0.0635 0.0639/0.30 0.1997/0.1997 0.2036/0.2036 0.2070/0.2070 0.2082/0.The identification results of simultaneous harm of two hangers are shown in Figure six. As could be noticed from Figure 6a,b, the hangers with decreased cable force are N2 and N4, and N3 and N7, respectively. Thus, the broken hangers can be identifi.
