R more light around the subject, and I have no doubt
R far more light around the topic, and I have no doubt that the agitation in the question will tremendously contribute to advance our expertise of magnetism…Prof. Williamson of University Coll. has sent a paper to the Royal Society upon the subject of a medium. I heard it study final night, but did not really feel in a position to enter upon the …I hope to become able to send you an account of an excellent number of facts in connection using the subject of compression as soon as my lectures here are concluded…I’ve purposely avoided mingling the matter too much with my paper on polarity which is now GSK1278863 biological activity within the hands from the Royal Society. The want to keep this latter query as a lot as you can to itself, and not the want of material, has prevented me from getting into a lot more fully upon the Topic of Compression. A brief communication on the `medium’ from Mr. Faraday will appear within the next number of the Phil. Mag.277 He also wrote to Hirst suggesting he might like to combat Williamson by writing a brief paper278 that Tyndall could bring ahead of the Royal Society,279 sending a note of approval for Hirst’s efforts on three April.280 The paper was study and printed in July.273 W Thomson, `Observations around the “Magnetic Medium” and around the Effects of Compression’, Philosophical Magazine (855), 9, 290. 274 George Airy (80892), astronomer, became Astronomer Royal in 835 till his retirement in 88. 275 A. W. Williamson, `A Note on the Magnetic Medium’, Proceedings on the Royal Society of London 7 (855), 7, 306. Alexander Williamson (824904), chemist. 276 Tyndall, Journal, 5 March 855. 277 Tyndall to Thomson, 5 March 855, RI MS JTTYP5538539. This term `medium’, with its overtimes of the spiritualism that each Faraday and Tyndall abhorred, had distinct meanings. To Faraday the medium was the lines of force. Tyndall’s position will not be so clear, though he was a constant believer inside the ether. 278 T. A. Hirst, `On the Existence of a Magnetic Medium’, Proceedings with the Royal Society of London (854), 7, 4484. 279 Tyndall to Hirst, March 855, RI MS JTT007. 280 Tyndall to Hirst, 3 April 855, RI MS JTT596. 28 Tyndall to Hirst, 26 July 855, RI MS JTT609.Roland JacksonOn 2 March Tyndall replied to a letter from Thomson, writing really substantially as an equal when compared with his first letters in 850: I have read your letter a second time this morning. It seems to me to provide a want within the writings you may have hitherto published on the subject of molecular induction in paramagnetic and diamagnetic bodies, on this account if you believed effectively of it I need to be glad to possess the portion on the letter which refers to this subject (or the whole letter should you choose it) published within the next quantity of the Philosophical Magazine.282 Thomson replied on 22 March providing permission and describing experiments he had lately carried out with compressed iron filings or tiny wire pieces in soft wax or dough, after they all 
set perpendicularly towards the lines of force, which he understood were unique to these obtained by Tyndall for paramagnetic substances generally.283 On 26 April Stokes wrote to Tyndall: In the final meeting in the Council it was voted, around the recommendation of your referees, that your paper need to PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14670645 be printed within the Transactions. Both the referees have made remarks in side papers on points right here and there in your paper. These I submit to your consideration. … Thomson in his report seemed to believe that you’ve been contending in element against an imaginary adversary, for using the exception of Von Feilitsch w.
