The expression of CXCR4 in EEPCs and EOCs in the MedChemExpress GSK -3203591 presence of GSI. The results showed that the expression of CXCR4 in EEPCs was reduced in the presence of GSI. But in contrast, the expression of CXCR4 mRNA in EOCs was up-regulated upon blocking Notch signaling pathway by GSI (Figure 2E). We also assessed the effect of Notch blockade on the migration of EEPCs and EOCs by using the cell 223488-57-1 site scratch assay. EEPCs and EOCs were cultured to confluence and a scratch was made in each culture. Cells were cultured further in the presence of GSI, and cells migrating into the scratched areas were counted. The results showed that blocking of Notch signaling by GSI led to decreased migration of EEPCs (226615.1 in control vs. 33.3611 in GSI-treated) (P,0.01), whereas the same treatment resulted in increased migration of EOCs (83.368.8 in control vs. 233.3612 in GSItreated) (P,0.05) (Fig. 2F and 2G). These results indicated that Notch signaling played opposite roles in the proliferation and migration of EEPCs and EOCs.Notch signal blockade led to increased sprouting and endothelial sprout extension by EOCsWe next evaluated the ability to form vessels by EEPCs and EOCs by using a three dimensional in vitro sprouting model, in which cells were attached to Cytodex 3 microcarrier beads and were permitted to sprout in fibrinogen gels [33]. EEPCs failed to sprout (data not shown). When EOCs were cultured in the system, sprouting started on around day 2, and cord-like sprouts grew out with the culture being proceeded (Figure 3A; Figure S2). In the presence of GSI, the number of the sprouts and the length of the sprouts were significantly increased as compared with the control (Figure 3A?C). This result suggested that blocking the Notch 
signaling pathway could promote the ability of EOCs to participate in vessel formation, likely through increased sprouting and endothelial sprout extension.Blocking Notch signaling showed different effects on the proliferation and migration of EEPCs and EOCsTo evaluate the role of the Notch signaling pathway in EEPCs and EOCs, we treated these cells with a c-secretase inhibitor (GSI) to block Notch signaling. EEPCs and EOCs were pre-labeled with carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE), 1081537 and cell proliferation was examined by fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) on the fifth day (EEPCs) or second day (EOCs), due to theRBP-J deficient EEPCs and EOCs displayed different tendency of homing into liver during liver regenerationEPCs could migrate to injured tissues and participate in tissue repair and regeneration through various mechanisms [3]. We have shown that EPCs participate in partial hepatectomy (PHx)induced liver regeneration, and this role is regulated by Notch signaling [30]. Next we tried to clarify the role of Notch signaling in EEPCs and EOCs during liver regeneration induced by PHx. To achieve this, we employed the RBP-J conditional knockoutNotch Regulates EEPCs and EOCs DifferentiallyFigure 1. Differential expression of Notch-related molecules in BM-derived EEPCs and EOCs. (A) BM mononuclear cells were 16574785 cultured under conditions to generate EEPCs. Cells that were freshly isolated (D0) or cultured for 10 days (D10) were labeled with fluorescent antibodies to CD133, CD34, and VEGFR2, and were analyzed by FACS. (B) The numbers of cell in (A) were calculated and shown. (C) The EEPC culture in (A) was continued for 8 more weeks to generate EOCs. Cells were stained with fluorescent antibodies against CD133, CD3.The expression of CXCR4 in EEPCs and EOCs in the presence of GSI. The results showed that the expression of CXCR4 in EEPCs was reduced in the presence of GSI. But in contrast, the expression of CXCR4 mRNA in EOCs was up-regulated upon blocking Notch signaling pathway by GSI (Figure 2E). We also assessed the effect of Notch blockade on the migration of EEPCs and EOCs by using the cell scratch assay. EEPCs and EOCs were cultured to confluence and a scratch was made in each culture. Cells were cultured further in the presence of GSI, and cells migrating into the scratched areas were counted. The results showed that blocking of Notch signaling by GSI led to decreased migration of EEPCs (226615.1 in control vs. 33.3611 in GSI-treated) (P,0.01), whereas the same treatment resulted in increased migration of EOCs (83.368.8 in control vs. 233.3612 in GSItreated) (P,0.05) (Fig. 2F and 2G). These results indicated that Notch signaling played opposite roles in the proliferation and migration of EEPCs and EOCs.Notch signal blockade led to increased sprouting and endothelial sprout extension by EOCsWe next evaluated the ability to form vessels by EEPCs and EOCs by using 
a three dimensional in vitro sprouting model, in which cells were attached to Cytodex 3 microcarrier beads and were permitted to sprout in fibrinogen gels [33]. EEPCs failed to sprout (data not shown). When EOCs were cultured in the system, sprouting started on around day 2, and cord-like sprouts grew out with the culture being proceeded (Figure 3A; Figure S2). In the presence of GSI, the number of the sprouts and the length of the sprouts were significantly increased as compared with the control (Figure 3A?C). This result suggested that blocking the Notch signaling pathway could promote the ability of EOCs to participate in vessel formation, likely through increased sprouting and endothelial sprout extension.Blocking Notch signaling showed different effects on the proliferation and migration of EEPCs and EOCsTo evaluate the role of the Notch signaling pathway in EEPCs and EOCs, we treated these cells with a c-secretase inhibitor (GSI) to block Notch signaling. EEPCs and EOCs were pre-labeled with carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE), 1081537 and cell proliferation was examined by fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) on the fifth day (EEPCs) or second day (EOCs), due to theRBP-J deficient EEPCs and EOCs displayed different tendency of homing into liver during liver regenerationEPCs could migrate to injured tissues and participate in tissue repair and regeneration through various mechanisms [3]. We have shown that EPCs participate in partial hepatectomy (PHx)induced liver regeneration, and this role is regulated by Notch signaling [30]. Next we tried to clarify the role of Notch signaling in EEPCs and EOCs during liver regeneration induced by PHx. To achieve this, we employed the RBP-J conditional knockoutNotch Regulates EEPCs and EOCs DifferentiallyFigure 1. Differential expression of Notch-related molecules in BM-derived EEPCs and EOCs. (A) BM mononuclear cells were 16574785 cultured under conditions to generate EEPCs. Cells that were freshly isolated (D0) or cultured for 10 days (D10) were labeled with fluorescent antibodies to CD133, CD34, and VEGFR2, and were analyzed by FACS. (B) The numbers of cell in (A) were calculated and shown. (C) The EEPC culture in (A) was continued for 8 more weeks to generate EOCs. Cells were stained with fluorescent antibodies against CD133, CD3.
